4 ms·

>So what does the PC-Catalog suggest, when one minority wants to end tolerance and other minoritys, once it is the majority? Is that an honest question? Becaus

>So what does the PC-Catalog suggest, when one minority wants to end tolerance and other minoritys, once it is the majority? Is that an honest question? Because it sounds like trolling. In what way does protecting a minority promote them to a majority? In what way does it condone their belief systems? Why do people have such a ridiculously hard time not conflating the adherents of t religion with the religion itself?

LifeLiverTransp 8y ago
Religion, dogmatic, and enforced, self-encapsulating is actually capable to survive the onslaught of a liberal society. Take the amish, there self-contained believe system, has allowed them to expand, peacefully and all, but they definatly have outgrown - within local communities any liberal alternative. https://www.citylab.com/equity/2012/08/exploding-amish-population-bubble/2795/ https://www.citylab.com/equity/2012/08/exploding-amish-popul... Now take a dogmatic religion, that is not peacefull- and watch wherever it comes to power- minorities beeing routed and pluralism and democracy falter. As examples may i cite the Arab spring countries, turkey, syrias sunnites, indonesia - http://sp2010.bps.go.id/index.php/site/tabel?tid=321&wid=0 http://sp2010.bps.go.id/index.php/site/tabel?tid=321&wid=0 Im pretty sure, i can take your standardized reply from here. First of all its not one religion, its many variants - so nobody is responsible by the virtues of distribution of failure into the privat sector of the individual choice. To which i reply: Yes, and no. Its one species of humans, planetwide, and religions are particular lousy to limit those human emotions in times of crisis. While christianity is tamed, well behaved or even in decline in the west- one religion-group then, has a track record for not working with democracy. There are not many islamic democratic countries, which are not sliding into toletarian directions. Having to flee from ones self created social catastrophe, does not make one a virtue-angel by the grace of weakness. If evangelicals would try to escape a trump ruled Gilead- does theire religion and culture warrant a special treatment? No compromises, no colonialization of the public mind sphere, with illegtime power structures and moral concepts. Keep religion private.

LifeLiverTransp 8y ago

Religion, dogmatic, and enforced, self-encapsulating is actually capable to survive the onslaught of a liberal society. Take the amish, there self-contained believe system, has allowed them to expand, peacefully and all, but they definatly have outgrown - within local communities any liberal alternative. https://www.citylab.com/equity/2012/08/exploding-amish-population-bubble/2795/ https://www.citylab.com/equity/2012/08/exploding-amish-popul... Now take a dogmatic religion, that is not peacefull- and watch wherever it comes to power- minorities beeing routed and pluralism and democracy falter. As examples may i cite the Arab spring countries, turkey, syrias sunnites, indonesia - http://sp2010.bps.go.id/index.php/site/tabel?tid=321&wid=0 http://sp2010.bps.go.id/index.php/site/tabel?tid=321&wid=0 Im pretty sure, i can take your standardized reply from here. First of all its not one religion, its many variants - so nobody is responsible by the virtues of distribution of failure into the privat sector of the individual choice. To which i reply: Yes, and no. Its one species of humans, planetwide, and religions are particular lousy to limit those human emotions in times of crisis. While christianity is tamed, well behaved or even in decline in the west- one religion-group then, has a track record for not working with democracy. There are not many islamic democratic countries, which are not sliding into toletarian directions. Having to flee from ones self created social catastrophe, does not make one a virtue-angel by the grace of weakness. If evangelicals would try to escape a trump ruled Gilead- does theire religion and culture warrant a special treatment? No compromises, no colonialization of the public mind sphere, with illegtime power structures and moral concepts. Keep religion private.