4 ms·

I'm not sure 1 line in a 3,000-word article is a fair amount? Especially considering, the research I have concluded makes this seem like a fairly popular common

• iaw 8y ago
  That was the one line I picked, if you did a fair amount of research please add citations in line. Quickly, a couple other lines that are editorializing without adequate references: "Inflation is the tax we all pay for the fraud of money printing." "We currently operate under what is widely known as the debt-based monetary system, this system has a requirement that debt continues to grow. The system relies on people getting further into debt which in essence creates more money into the system." My opinion about central banks and their background can be changed but it requires a lot more citation to justify your reasoning. This article is trying to further an agenda associated with crypto-currencies while stating opinions as fact without appropriate references. It's not poorly written but it is poorly referenced.
  • acob 8y ago
    Thank you for your time. I really appreciate you taking a read and providing feedback. Admittedly I am more of a tech nerd than a formal writer. Recommendations have been noted, and I look to improve in future posts.
• dragonwriter 8y ago
  > I'm not sure 1 line in a 3,000-word article is a fair amount? Assuming this is a misplaced reply to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18231623 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18231623 — there is more than one line of editorializing in the article; virtually every sentence in the article contains either editorializing or fact claims that don't seem grounded in the few cited sources, and some contain both.