3 ms·
Or they could go public and avoid the problem entirely. Let's not pretend there aren't other alternatives. Public, Open markets are there for a reason. They c
by supercanuck 8y ago
Or they could go public and avoid the problem entirely.
Let's not pretend there aren't other alternatives.
Public, Open markets are there for a reason.
They cost more, but are more ethical.
- vkou 8y ago> They cost more, but are more ethical. They aren't. If you go public, you have zero control of who owns your company. It's not more ethical - it just launders your ethical responsibility. There are plenty of people or organizations - who also happen to have a horrific ethical record - who can buy shares in a private company. And there's nothing you can do to stop that.
- tartoran 8y agoI'd argue in this case with Saudi money that zero control is better than blood money