There's a fair amount of editorializing in this post that isn't born out by the limited references included. One example is this line: "Why was this all done i

There's a fair amount of editorializing in this post that isn't born out by the limited references included. One example is this line: "Why was this all done in secret? Simply put, the American people did not want a Central Bank. In 1910, unlike today, people had a better understanding of exactly central banking was and what it tried to do." That's a pretty strong claim that I'd love to see justified using appropriate references but, even if they exist, the author doesn't appropriate link them to their claims.