3 ms·
Hahahaha! Social sharing is great! Do not fear the share bar! Seriously though, sorry about that - not sure if we can do anything on our end as that's the way t
by atYevP 8y ago
Hahahaha! Social sharing is great! Do not fear the share bar! Seriously though, sorry about that - not sure if we can do anything on our end as that's the way that widget works :( We might be able to add a "print" button so you can just print the post out, would that help?
- wlesieutre 8y agoIt's not that I never share things, I'd just rather ctrl-C/ctrl-V than waste a bunch of screen space on every single webpage. Looks like Firefox's reader view fixes it, I'll just need to get in the habit of using that instead of the Kill Sticky Headers bookmarklet as things catch on and circumvent it... https://alisdair.mcdiarmid.org/kill-sticky-headers/ https://alisdair.mcdiarmid.org/kill-sticky-headers/ I can only assume the thought process of whoever writes these social bars is "People are hiding our share buttons instead of clicking them! MAYBE IF WE SHOVE IT IN THEIR FACES REPEATEDLY THEY'LL LIKE THAT BETTER AND WANT TO SHARE!" Gruber sums up my feelings nicely: https://daringfireball.net/2017/06/medium_dickbars https://daringfireball.net/2017/06/medium_dickbars
- atYevP 8y agoHeh, "medium dickbars", hell of a title, and I think that's EXACTLY what the social bar manufacturers are thinking. Unfortunately though, they're super useful :-/
- sosborn 8y ago> they're super useful Useful for whom? The user, or website operator? Snark aside, do the sharebars actually increase user engagement on your site?
- atYevP 8y agoThe operator of course. They are definitely useful (at least on our end). We've found that making it easy to share the blogs increases the odds that folks actually boink the button and add a personalized message. Plus the share counting works as "social proof" for posts. If you read a blog post that 3 other people have shared you might abandon it before finishing. If 300 people have shared it, you'll likely be more prone to finish searching for why they thought it was so interesting. That can be gamed though, but we keep ours "natural".
- bubblethink 8y ago>Gruber sums up my feelings nicely: https://daringfireball.net/2017/06/medium_dickbars https://daringfireball.net/2017/06/medium_dickbars Ironically, that site is perhaps more unreadable than a typical medium page. It uses some hardcoded mobile format (?) that shows tiny text in the middle 20% of my 16:9 screen.
- wlesieutre 8y agoAnd you can't just double tap the text column to fit it to screen? That's odd, since it doesn't appear to set a maximum-scale or user-scalable=no on the viewport: <meta name="viewport" content="width=500, minimum-scale=0.45" /> #worksonmymachine
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]