3 ms·

Yev from Backblaze here -> of course I'm around :D Good questions! We recycle the drives that get removed from service. As for future shortages, that's one of

by atYevP 8y ago

Yev from Backblaze here -> of course I'm around :D Good questions! We recycle the drives that get removed from service. As for future shortages, that's one of the reasons we took a small round back in 2012 (https://www.backblaze.com/blog/backblaze-raises-5-million-why-we-took-funding-after-5-years-of-bootstrapping/ https://www.backblaze.com/blog/backblaze-raises-5-million-wh...). The majority of it was to spend on marketing experiments, but a little portion was to be used for buffer if an event like that ever happened again and hard drive prices spiked 300%. We're a lot larger now and do a pretty good job with forecasting and having rainy day funds, but we've also gotten to the point where we are now a bit less price sensitive, so we'd be able to handle the fluctuation. That said, if everything goes horribly wrong...https://www.backblaze.com/blog/backblaze_drive_farming/ https://www.backblaze.com/blog/backblaze_drive_farming/

wlesieutre 8y ago
You might not be the right person to do anything about this, but I have a bookmarklet for hiding position:fixed elements when I'm trying to read something, and every time I scroll your blog it recreates the obnoxious share bar. Whyyyyyyy? EDIT: PS- fun story! I enjoyed reading it except for all the social media buttons.
- atYevP 8y ago
  Hahahaha! Social sharing is great! Do not fear the share bar! Seriously though, sorry about that - not sure if we can do anything on our end as that's the way that widget works :( We might be able to add a "print" button so you can just print the post out, would that help?
  - wlesieutre 8y ago
    It's not that I never share things, I'd just rather ctrl-C/ctrl-V than waste a bunch of screen space on every single webpage. Looks like Firefox's reader view fixes it, I'll just need to get in the habit of using that instead of the Kill Sticky Headers bookmarklet as things catch on and circumvent it... https://alisdair.mcdiarmid.org/kill-sticky-headers/ https://alisdair.mcdiarmid.org/kill-sticky-headers/ I can only assume the thought process of whoever writes these social bars is "People are hiding our share buttons instead of clicking them! MAYBE IF WE SHOVE IT IN THEIR FACES REPEATEDLY THEY'LL LIKE THAT BETTER AND WANT TO SHARE!" Gruber sums up my feelings nicely: https://daringfireball.net/2017/06/medium_dickbars https://daringfireball.net/2017/06/medium_dickbars
    - atYevP 8y ago
      Heh, "medium dickbars", hell of a title, and I think that's EXACTLY what the social bar manufacturers are thinking. Unfortunately though, they're super useful :-/
      - sosborn 8y ago
        > they're super useful Useful for whom? The user, or website operator? Snark aside, do the sharebars actually increase user engagement on your site?
        atYevP 8y ago
        The operator of course. They are definitely useful (at least on our end). We've found that making it easy to share the blogs increases the odds that folks actually boink the button and add a personalized message. Plus the share counting works as "social proof" for posts. If you read a blog post that 3 other people have shared you might abandon it before finishing. If 300 people have shared it, you'll likely be more prone to finish searching for why they thought it was so interesting. That can be gamed though, but we keep ours "natural".
    - bubblethink 8y ago
      >Gruber sums up my feelings nicely: https://daringfireball.net/2017/06/medium_dickbars https://daringfireball.net/2017/06/medium_dickbars Ironically, that site is perhaps more unreadable than a typical medium page. It uses some hardcoded mobile format (?) that shows tiny text in the middle 20% of my 16:9 screen.
      - wlesieutre 8y ago
        And you can't just double tap the text column to fit it to screen? That's odd, since it doesn't appear to set a maximum-scale or user-scalable=no on the viewport: <meta name="viewport" content="width=500, minimum-scale=0.45" /> #worksonmymachine
  - deleted 8y ago
    [deleted]
js2 8y ago
Looking at 8TB drives on Amazon right now, external USB 3.0 8TB drives are $150 (e.g. STEB8000100). Bare 8TB drives (e.g. ST8000DM004) are $200 and up. This isn't the same class of drive. Supposedly what's inside the STEB8000100 is a ST8000AS0002 5900 RPM archive drive. But that drive, which you can barely even find anymore, is over $200. What's up with this pricing?
deleted 8y ago
[deleted]

by atYevP 8y ago

wlesieutre 8y ago

You might not be the right person to do anything about this, but I have a bookmarklet for hiding position:fixed elements when I'm trying to read something, and every time I scroll your blog it recreates the obnoxious share bar. Whyyyyyyy? EDIT: PS- fun story! I enjoyed reading it except for all the social media buttons.

atYevP 8y ago
Hahahaha! Social sharing is great! Do not fear the share bar! Seriously though, sorry about that - not sure if we can do anything on our end as that's the way that widget works :( We might be able to add a "print" button so you can just print the post out, would that help?
- wlesieutre 8y ago
  It's not that I never share things, I'd just rather ctrl-C/ctrl-V than waste a bunch of screen space on every single webpage. Looks like Firefox's reader view fixes it, I'll just need to get in the habit of using that instead of the Kill Sticky Headers bookmarklet as things catch on and circumvent it... https://alisdair.mcdiarmid.org/kill-sticky-headers/ https://alisdair.mcdiarmid.org/kill-sticky-headers/ I can only assume the thought process of whoever writes these social bars is "People are hiding our share buttons instead of clicking them! MAYBE IF WE SHOVE IT IN THEIR FACES REPEATEDLY THEY'LL LIKE THAT BETTER AND WANT TO SHARE!" Gruber sums up my feelings nicely: https://daringfireball.net/2017/06/medium_dickbars https://daringfireball.net/2017/06/medium_dickbars
  - atYevP 8y ago
    Heh, "medium dickbars", hell of a title, and I think that's EXACTLY what the social bar manufacturers are thinking. Unfortunately though, they're super useful :-/
    - sosborn 8y ago
      > they're super useful Useful for whom? The user, or website operator? Snark aside, do the sharebars actually increase user engagement on your site?
      - atYevP 8y ago
        The operator of course. They are definitely useful (at least on our end). We've found that making it easy to share the blogs increases the odds that folks actually boink the button and add a personalized message. Plus the share counting works as "social proof" for posts. If you read a blog post that 3 other people have shared you might abandon it before finishing. If 300 people have shared it, you'll likely be more prone to finish searching for why they thought it was so interesting. That can be gamed though, but we keep ours "natural".
  - bubblethink 8y ago
    >Gruber sums up my feelings nicely: https://daringfireball.net/2017/06/medium_dickbars https://daringfireball.net/2017/06/medium_dickbars Ironically, that site is perhaps more unreadable than a typical medium page. It uses some hardcoded mobile format (?) that shows tiny text in the middle 20% of my 16:9 screen.
    - wlesieutre 8y ago
      And you can't just double tap the text column to fit it to screen? That's odd, since it doesn't appear to set a maximum-scale or user-scalable=no on the viewport: <meta name="viewport" content="width=500, minimum-scale=0.45" /> #worksonmymachine
- deleted 8y ago
  [deleted]

js2 8y ago

Looking at 8TB drives on Amazon right now, external USB 3.0 8TB drives are $150 (e.g. STEB8000100). Bare 8TB drives (e.g. ST8000DM004) are $200 and up. This isn't the same class of drive. Supposedly what's inside the STEB8000100 is a ST8000AS0002 5900 RPM archive drive. But that drive, which you can barely even find anymore, is over $200. What's up with this pricing?

deleted 8y ago

[deleted]