I see this argument being used a lot now. "It's okay to censor Alex Jones because it's done by a private industry". "Presumption of innocence doesn't apply to

I see this argument being used a lot now. "It's okay to censor Alex Jones because it's done by a private industry". "Presumption of innocence doesn't apply to Judge Kav because this is a 'job interview'". I feel what's lacking here is core principles.