3 ms·
There are more straightforward and less costly to the public insurer ways to die than earning the right to ride a motorcycle without a helmet. If you're blind,
by adetrest 8y ago
There are more straightforward and less costly to the public insurer ways to die than earning the right to ride a motorcycle without a helmet.
If you're blind, you aren't allowed to drive a car. If you can't wear a helmet then why should you be allowed to ride without one?
I'm all for inclusion and respecting others' practices, but this is short-sighted.
- zeroname 8y agoFirst of all, why should you be forced to ride with a helmet? Your argument seems to be cost to "the public insurer", but I don't think that's a clear cut way to save money, it really depends on the insurance. For health/disability insurance, fatalities will be cheaper than a crippling injury over a lifetime, so from a cost perspective, it may well be best to optimize for lowest survival rate.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]