1. That's just being pedantic. Just stick with what you said instead of trying worm out of it. 2. There's nothing emotionally charged about any of that. It's a

1. That's just being pedantic. Just stick with what you said instead of trying worm out of it. 2. There's nothing emotionally charged about any of that. It's a pretty satirical take on the reality you attempted to present in your first post. IF that makes you uncomfortable then fix your statements being easily satirized. 3. That's not how arguments work, or even how law gets interpreted. 4. You can't really attempt to weaponize HN guidelines when the evidence that you in fact were not following them is visible for everyone to see. You were not respectful to me, to the community (by lying), and certainly not to anyone else who you don't agree with. >Win it with your facts and logical process you claim to have but haven't yet expressed. I did. This is the veneer I was referencing. You were in fact the person to reference having superior reasoning skills, but did nothing to demonstrate their presence or even mastery.