3 ms·
> there's no clear and blatant systematic bias? I haven't been convinced of it, no. > Harvard and Duke are both more selective/prestigious than UNC, therefore
by akhilcacharya 8y ago
> there's no clear and blatant systematic bias?
I haven't been convinced of it, no.
> Harvard and Duke are both more selective/prestigious than UNC, therefore they are equally selective/prestigious?
No, but some 86% of applicants can't get into Duke and 95% can't get into Harvard so I'm not sure if that extra 9% is really worth complaining over. It reeks of incredible elitism.
For the record, Yale and Stanford are in the same tier. Most of the ordinary folks in this country don't go to competitive schools at all, if they go.