A strange tone to this article. "X did this bad thing and obviously this bad thing because they are obviously bad." "To be clear, while excuse here and excuse h

A strange tone to this article. "X did this bad thing and obviously this bad thing because they are obviously bad." "To be clear, while excuse here and excuse here, Y did a thing that could be perceived as bad, but not as bad because it's their rules and it has been done before." Really tough to read. Also, I am not very familiar with the case, can anyone shed any light on whether the justices are remorseful for their overspendings and other wrongdoings? Any links to apologies or denials? Are some not voluntarily resigning because they don't feel like what they did was bad enough? I clearly understand the legislature's faults in this story just want more details from the judges themselves.