At the beginning of the article, the authors cite 3 anonymous sources: > ... according to three people with knowledge of the matter, who asked not to be identi

At the beginning of the article, the authors cite 3 anonymous sources: > ... according to three people with knowledge of the matter, who asked not to be identified because the details are private... Then, the end of the article mentions 3 VCs: > Two venture capitalists, speaking on condition of anonymity because the discussions were private, expressed concern that Robinhood's ties to high-frequency traders might undermine its image and stymie expansion plans. A third said it was the reason he didn't invest. I wonder if this article is the product of some VC sour grapes.