3 ms·
I don't have a problem with this. It's the reason there is an emoluments clause in the first place. You take political office and you divest from stocks that co
by yardie 8y ago
I don't have a problem with this. It's the reason there is an emoluments clause in the first place. You take political office and you divest from stocks that could be considered a conflict. And if someone wants to make a claim they'll need to back it up, same as it ever was.
Oh, that's not what our politicians did. They just wrote the law that made them exempt from insider trading instead.
- blattimwind 8y ago"Now now, it can be hardly called insider trading when it's done from a public office!"