> proactively seeking candidates for racial diversity What is the difference in practice? If we proactively filled all of Harvard with disadvantaged races and

> proactively seeking candidates for racial diversity What is the difference in practice? If we proactively filled all of Harvard with disadvantaged races and didn't accept any asians, would you still be saying the same thing? Proactively helping one race is the same as hurting others. Maybe there would be a difference if Harvard was helping disadvantaged races only at childrearing-time instead of at application-time (the definition of pro-active), but they're not.