> There is no debt, though. No-one's disputing that. The parent post is supposing that because taking this to court and proving that United violated the law is

> There is no debt, though. No-one's disputing that. The parent post is supposing that because taking this to court and proving that United violated the law is expensive (in both money and more importantly effort), a large enough percentage of people will not do it. It's yet another example of the mere involvement of the legal system being used as a deterrent against individuals, regardless of who's in the right.