3 ms·
I agree that we can define a lower bound of reports for the questions asked, and the terms as defined by the survey. The lower bounds are: At least 4/384=1% re
by asabjorn 8y ago
I agree that we can define a lower bound of reports for the questions asked, and the terms as defined by the survey.
The lower bounds are: At least 4/384=1% reported unwanted sexual contact, 15/384=3.9% quid pro quo and 19/384=4.9% sexual badgering. The real number would be higher if all female founders responded or were asked.
- jacquesm 8y agoThat's another way of looking at it. I do agree that the balance could shift either way but I suspect that the self selected group has a lower incidence of harassment because they already joined a support structure of sorts, which would allow them to keep each other posted about who to avoid. Of course that is just my belief.
- asabjorn 8y agoIt is hard to make assumptions. However, I would hope that there is a correlation between support structures we can and have put in place with a lower incidence rate.