3 ms·

It's under their brand, they published it. Imho we should expect better from them

• gojomo 8y ago
  Still doesn't make it accurate to attribute it to 'The Guardian'. And still, even a publication with a strong "house perspective", like The Guardian, doesn't limit itself to publishing only commentaries it fully endorses. I know this is confusing to online readers, and in some cases poor design by the outlets feeds it further, but outlets like this have long tradition of publishing things they don't fully, or even partially, agree with. Roubini's in the news – just testified for the US Congress – so his perspective is worth understanding, separate from any publications' own beliefs. (And The Guardian is likely to have some sympathy for his opinion, but even there – wrong to attribute Roubini's signed words to the publication.)
  • leereeves 8y ago
    There's still a selection involved; they don't publish every outside submission. It's fair to question why they choose the ones they do.
    • gojomo 8y ago
      Still not correct or fair to attribute statements by others to The Guardian!