I didn't really want to into argument about libertarian anarchism but I just didn't see your point directly relating to the rest of your post. But your argumen

I didn't really want to into argument about libertarian anarchism but I just didn't see your point directly relating to the rest of your post. But your argument, inherent bias toward centralisation is the old and traditional argument that statist libertarian also use. Nozick is most well known for that argument. I don't want to really argue for it to much, just want to make clear that, its not about 'wishing' anything away. Violence is reduced if some level of balance of power exists and conflict resumption is available and the believe is that this could exist without government. As this is Hacker News its not the place for this argument, I would just recommend 'Anarchy and the Law: The Political Economy of Choice' as a great book on this. It includes chapters by different people arguing the two positions, and some other nice content about the subject.