3 ms·
>That said, I think the main point is that his manager and some of his colleagues ganged up on him because they felt threatened, and that resulted in him being
by marcinzm 8y ago
>That said, I think the main point is that his manager and some of his colleagues ganged up on him because they felt threatened, and that resulted in him being let go.
>That does indicate a problem for Google if true.
I mean, if his writing is a reflection of how he behaves then why is this a problem for Google? Getting rid of toxic people in a company is a positive and not a negative.
- AstralStorm 8y agoThis is assuming they are actually toxic and not a scapegoat. Can't tell that from a single post as it usually takes more than one instance for a person to blow a gasket just like that. (unless there is something really wrong) People on bad projects like scapegoats. Ganging up on one guy, especially new young upstart, is a sign of a dysfunctional team too.
- mercer 8y agoHe doesn't come across as toxic. At worst, he's not a team player. That can be a problem, but I'd argue not being able to tolerate or channel these individuals definitely is a portend of a bad corporate culture.