3 ms·
From the feedback wiki, it's clear that check/handle wasn't that well received. These requirements might illuminate a viable path. https://github.com/golang/go
by networkimprov 8y ago
From the feedback wiki, it's clear that check/handle wasn't that well received. These requirements might illuminate a viable path.
https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/Go2ErrorHandlingFeedback https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/Go2ErrorHandlingFeedback
- coder543 8y agoThe discussions I saw on Reddit were strongly in favor of `check`, and the link you provided seems to show a 50/50 split, so your summary surprises me. People suggesting changes doesn't indicate that people oppose the idea, in my opinion... it means they're interested in making sure the execution is good.
- networkimprov 8y agoI don't see where the 50/50 split is. I didn't imply that the feedback rejected any change to error handling. Re 'check', more than half of the counter-proposals suggest various ways to select a named handler, which check cannot do.
- coder543 8y ago> I don't see where the 50/50 split is. There are 3 articles under "In support" and 3 articles under "Against". A pretty literal 50/50 split.
- networkimprov 8y agoAh, indeed :-) But many of the counter-proposals offer very different solutions than check/handle, so I'd count them as variations of "against".