3 ms·
I wouldn't be surprised if this was some sort of PR campaign similar to Iraq's WMDs. It does make sense that Iraq still has weapons of mass destruction and coul
by mtw 8y ago
I wouldn't be surprised if this was some sort of PR campaign similar to Iraq's WMDs. It does make sense that Iraq still has weapons of mass destruction and could use them against civil populations; likewise, it does make sense that China could access the supply chain, and could use it to access government and corporate networks. The end goal is to change public perception and get support on the idea that the US should focus its efforts on that country (instead of the Mueller investigation or Russia for example). In Iraq's WMDs, the symbol was Colin Powell's vial of Anthrax, here it's a tiny chip that promises to unlock all servers. It's a symbol strong enough that goes well on TV or media.
True or not, what matters is that the seeds of distrust has been sowed. It's billions of $ lost for Supermicro shareholders, and potentially distrust of China.
- DenisM 8y agoOne important difference is that in the run-up to the Iraq war every major newspaper was beating the drums of war, whereas here only one major newspaper is involved.
- draw_down 8y agoIndeed. It’s dismaying (though not surprising) how many people are satisfied with “it makes sense”. Anyone remember the schematic illustration of Bin Laden’s supposed mountain fortress that ran, unquestioned, in newspapers? https://gizmodo.com/5800027/there-is-what-we-thought-osama-was-hiding-in-ten-years-ago https://gizmodo.com/5800027/there-is-what-we-thought-osama-w...