4 ms·
Incarceration is supposed to protect the upcoming trial, from the accused fleeing, tampering with evidence or witnesses. It is not a punitive measure. Innocent
by matt4077 8y ago
Incarceration is supposed to protect the upcoming trial, from the accused fleeing, tampering with evidence or witnesses.
It is not a punitive measure. Innocent until proven guilty, etc.
So while it's fair to criticise the disparate abilities to post bail, changing the system to incarcerate more rich accused would just be compounding injustice.
- andrewaylett 8y agoOn the other hand, in the UK: "Under s. 4 of the Bail Act 1976, on each occasion that a person is brought before a court accused of an offence, or remanded after conviction for enquiries or a report, he must be granted bail without condition, if none of the exceptions to bail apply." https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/bail https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/bail Charging an arm and a leg to receive bail doesn't seem like it's serving any useful purpose?