> Providing such evidence was literally the main claim made in the top-level comment on this now very long thread... You provided evidence that spending has ad

> Providing such evidence was literally the main claim made in the top-level comment on this now very long thread... You provided evidence that spending has additive value in predicting outcomes? Please, cite it again. > Also, the fact that spending correlates well with other test-based performance metrics (see: the top-level comment on this now very long thread). You want to use, as evidence to support the view that spending provides novel information over and above performance evaluation, that it correlates with performance evaluation?