3 ms·
Interesting study, but this totally falls under Betteridge's law of headlines. No, influencers aren't overrated. There is no way in hell I will get the message
by luka-birsa 8y ago
Interesting study, but this totally falls under Betteridge's law of headlines. No, influencers aren't overrated.
There is no way in hell I will get the message across as effectively as if I have an influencer spread it. This should not even be a question. If I have a story and I tell it to 7 people at random and convince them to spread it vs. convince Paul Graham to spread it - no contest.
We just did a test with one influencer (6M followers on Twitter) to promote our products - bang for buck way better than advertising.
The connection asymmetry (good influencer has magnitudes more connection) and trust/influence (I trust/believe information coming from PG) are important. It is however hard work finding good influencers, and just having a lot of followers does not mean a thing if they are not engaged etc... But worth it.
- auganov 8y agoMind sharing some details? Did you do it through a middleman as part of an ongoing relationship or just was it a direct one-off? What's the approximate price range? How elaborate was the advertising itself (as in product placement, sponsored tweet, a combination of these etc)?
- dbuder 8y agoHow much did it cost?
- darkerside 8y agoIt would probably be better to ask if -- or even state that -- random nodes are underrated when compared to influencers.