Haven't read the link, but that's quite terrible, and the title is misleading. No idea why it's getting buzz in this thread. It means if tmpfs/equivalent isn't

Haven't read the link, but that's quite terrible, and the title is misleading. No idea why it's getting buzz in this thread. It means if tmpfs/equivalent isn't available, it will cause disk writes each application launch. Or if it caches the unpacking, it's susceptible to injection. And suppose the binary doesn't have write access to the filesystem?