4 ms·
To me the article's tone sounded more surprised at how little coverage there was on the bill, than outraged at the bill's contents. In fact, I thought the arti
by perennate 8y ago
To me the article's tone sounded more surprised at how little coverage there was on the bill, than outraged at the bill's contents.
In fact, I thought the article gave a quite positive view of the bill.
- djsumdog 8y agoYea it really did. They could have just left the entire Trump part out really. It's just a bill, that was passed and signed into law. Nothing unusual. It seems to help people and it's weird the Trump administration didn't try to do more marketing around it to make him look better.
- jlarocco 8y agoHonestly, I really don't see why it would get much coverage. Contrary to the article's hyperbole, it doesn't "radically change" anything, and I think most reasonable people would be in favor of the new rules. Mundane laws like this get passed all the time.