3 ms·

So, if a lot of the Angular decline is due to people migrating off of v1, and v2 isn't gaining in popularity as fast, is it really misleading to say that Angula

• IggleSniggle 8y ago
  I was just answering the question of why it is misleading to group them together. The frameworks are radically different and the install base is likely very different as well. If AngularJS (v1) was growing in popularity it wouldn’t really tell you anything about Angular (v2+), in the same way that the fact that Ember seeing a slow and steady growth doesn’t tell you anything about Angular (v2+). They’re different frameworks with dramatically different conventions and install bases. If AngularJS AND Angular were both losing popularity, it would still be misleading to group them together as “Angular.” They’re just not the same thing. Choosing to name the newer framework was, in retrospect, an extremely poor choice, especially since it alienated all AngularJS users since there was no good migration path at the time and everything was so different; it might have made some sort of marketing sense in the pre-React/Vue world that Angular (v2+) began its life in.