3 ms·

> If you have information to the contrary, i'm curious to hear it, though. Providing such evidence was literally the main claim made in the top-level comment o

> If you have information to the contrary, i'm curious to hear it, though. Providing such evidence was literally the main claim made in the top-level comment on this now very long thread... Also, the fact that spending correlates well with other test-based performance metrics (see: the top-level comment on this now very long thread). And that the state rankings that result from the NAEP-based ranking are wildly inconsistent if you construct rankings based on other tests (e.g., state exams, college extract exam scores).

darawk 8y ago
> Providing such evidence was literally the main claim made in the top-level comment on this now very long thread... You provided evidence that spending has additive value in predicting outcomes? Please, cite it again. > Also, the fact that spending correlates well with other test-based performance metrics (see: the top-level comment on this now very long thread). You want to use, as evidence to support the view that spending provides novel information over and above performance evaluation, that it correlates with performance evaluation?