3 ms·
https://blog.mikrotik.com/security/new-exploit-for-mikrotik-router-winbox-vulnerability.html https://blog.mikrotik.com/security/new-exploit-for-mikrotik-... "R
by philamonster 8y ago
https://blog.mikrotik.com/security/new-exploit-for-mikrotik-router-winbox-vulnerability.html https://blog.mikrotik.com/security/new-exploit-for-mikrotik-...
"Regardless of version used, all RouterOS versions that have the default firewall enabled, are not vulnerable"
I don't believe all MK devices OOTB had the WAN interface firewall'd (they do now though their wAP's run same license level 4 of RouterOS and do not have fw enabled on the ethernet port) though I do recall that being made very clear in both the documentation that came with the hardware and in any wiki/docs I looked at at the time I was first setting up my MK device.
The issue I have is the lack of communication with customers. I have not received any notification of this vuln since August 5th (well since patched in April) but they in general seem rather blase about the whole thing. I haven't followed the link to story but I follow BPR on Twitter and saw that it's around 421K according to censysio.
https://twitter.com/bad_packets/status/1050533001824595968 https://twitter.com/bad_packets/status/1050533001824595968
- pilsetnieks 8y agoThey've sent emails about this, posted to Twitter and Facebook, the software shows that there is an update available. If you've bought their device from a third party, and they don't have your contact information, how do you expect them to communicate with you?
- philamonster 8y agoPurchased everything on Amazon that was sold by Mikrotik. I follow a couple of their accounts on Twitter and will see routerOS version updates there well before I ever get an email. Like I said, I have not received any email about this vuln since August 5th (patched day of back in April). Email notification is paramount for me... Edit: I see...*notification via email is what I thought I had written in top post.