> If the State did go through the bother of taking an style of clause apart, pointing into it and saying "look, you can't do this", it's because there is a mora

> If the State did go through the bother of taking an style of clause apart, pointing into it and saying "look, you can't do this", it's because there is a moral problem with that style. It says something about the moral assessments of the people forming the political system (plus something about non-moral political factors), but that doesn't mean that the parties signing the contract don't find the clause moral by their own lights. (And likewise, if you're a moral objectivist, the clause can continue to be moral even as the political system is making a moral mistake.)