4 ms·
> iceland has no military, and no real political or economic significance in the world. it has no genuine allies to whom it is worthwhile. why doesn't anyone/ev
by sololipsist 8y ago
> iceland has no military, and no real political or economic significance in the world. it has no genuine allies to whom it is worthwhile. why doesn't anyone/everyone invade them? nobody would risk a major war over them. they're what could amount to a strategically useful port. they might have some minerals or something. it wouldn't even be hard.
> the answer is that nobody cares to.
This is an over-simplification of truly mind-boggling caliber.
- cryoshon 8y agono more of an over-simplification than kissinger's concept of realism, to be blunt. countries routinely do things that are contrary to the interest of maximizing their net power, and claiming "but it's anarchy out there!" isn't very accurate.
- sololipsist 8y agoI didn't say a word about Kissinger. If you need to pretend someone is arguing something they've never argued so you can disagree with them, you really need to take a step back and ask yourself what the fuck you're really doing.
- AnimalMuppet 8y agoThis is an incredibly unpersuasive response. You don't like the post? Fine. But correct it rather than just dissing it.
- sololipsist 8y agoSome things don't deserve a response. In that cases it's perfectly acceptable to note this and move on with your life. If you correct every brain-dead thing people tell you on the internet, either never say anything remotely controversial so you don't get ill-informed but confident replies, you spend all day correcting people, or you literally just started saying things on the internet to tell me how to live my life.
- AnimalMuppet 8y ago> Some things don't deserve a response. But you responded anyway. You just didn't respond with anything useful. So what you did, essentially, was waste 10,000 people's time by having them look at your non-response "response".
- sololipsist 8y agookay mom ::rolls eyes::