4 ms·
2FA over SMS is fine. It’s not the most secure thing, but it’s an improvement over just having a password. The problem is when people forget the “2” part and a
by mikeash 8y ago
2FA over SMS is fine. It’s not the most secure thing, but it’s an improvement over just having a password.
The problem is when people forget the “2” part and allow SMS to be a substitute for having the password. That should never be done.
The related problem is that, as a used, it’s hard to tell when some service wants your number for proper 2FA, or when they want it as a separate authentication mechanism they just happen to call “2FA.”
- z3t4 8y agoIf you register your phone nr your password basically get useless as someone can remotely (from another country even) steal your phone number and then reset your password.
- ilikepi 8y ago> ...it’s hard to tell when some service wants your number for proper 2FA, or when they want it as a separate authentication mechanism they just happen to call “2FA.” ...or when they want it to be able to call or text you with other BS entirely. I hesitate to give my cell number to any company. I have a separate number (formerly a landline, now strictly a voicemail box) that I use specifically for companies. I gave my cell number to a new dentist recently, thinking "medical office, probably important they be able to reach me." That turned out to be a mistake. They subscribed me to an automated appointment confirmation service, and they also send me a text (from a different number than the confirmation service) after I finish a visit to solicit reviews. This is exactly why I hate giving it out.
- floatboth 8y agoThe "best" part is password recovery — where SMS is typically the "second factor" to a completely insecure "secure question"
- palunon 8y agoYou have no obligation to answer the secure questions truthfully, or not to write a long random string of text... Starting with "Do not accept the answer if I can't spell this exactly" in case a human gets involved...
- Terr_ 8y agoIt frustrates me how almost every company's "secure question" system is utterly retarded and recklessly dangerous. 1. They draw from fixed unimaginative pools of often-overlapping questions, so that a breach in one company compromises you on multiple others. 2. Unlike a password, the actual secret question is often plaintext If I had to design a replacement... The user would always be allowed to define custom questions, all questions could be assigned multiple synonymous correct answers (e.g. "Dr. Smith", "Doctor Smith"), and they all go through a one-way hash with salt.
- hnaccy 8y agoJust today Google prevented me from logging in with the correct password and asked for a phone number as additional verification. Any phone number. The account has no associated number so it's not a verification at all!
- cataflam 8y agoThat's not for your benefit, that's for them to verify you're a human / not a spammer / collect information (at least that seems like the most reasonable explanation to me).