4 ms·
Did you read the article? They're trying to filter out lower relevance items, so that when you search "coffee maker" and sort by price, you don't get a 2.95 cof
by lalaithion 8y ago
Did you read the article? They're trying to filter out lower relevance items, so that when you search "coffee maker" and sort by price, you don't get a 2.95 coffee filter instead.
- maxxxxx 8y agoBut when I search for coffee maker without sort they show coffee filters. Just sort that list by price and let me figure out how to deal with coffee filters. In my opinion a sort should not change the content of the list.
- mokus 8y agoAnd if they can figure out which ones are not coffee makers, why not show the list without coffee filters to start with?
- theamk 8y agoBecause I do not trust them? I've seen them get it wrong -- and once you know that "sort by price" may not, in fact, give you the lowest price, it becomes completely useless. I would not mind if the filtering was optional; but it is not, so this is one more reason to avoid Amazon.