3 ms·
Yeah, I found that an odd comparison to make as well. If you want encrypted traffic that's all well and good, but there's no reason to assume that the private n
by chrismeller 8y ago
Yeah, I found that an odd comparison to make as well. If you want encrypted traffic that's all well and good, but there's no reason to assume that the private network is going to be any different performance wise than the exact same encrypted solution over the public interface - a network is a network is a network in this case.
Since the goal was to have a private network between your own boxes, the encryption was only really "required" to protect private data because it had to transit the public network in Hetzner. Since DO provides a private network natively there's (in theory) no justification for the encryption, which means you'd get native performance, hence the advantage.
- pstadler 8y agoAre you sure DO's private network traffic is actually encrypted or even isolated? Back some time ago, any host within the same private network could be reached. I wasn't surprised to see connection attempts from random hosts on eth1.
- TomMarius 8y agoOther comment there talks about it, they changed it a while ago and now it's isolated, but not encrypted.