> most of the money goes into salaries. And, therefore, anything that makes your engineers more or less efficient goes directly to your bottom line. (I agree

> most of the money goes into salaries. And, therefore, anything that makes your engineers more or less efficient goes directly to your bottom line. (I agree that the comment you're replying to underestimates the cost of migration. But the problem isn't a failure to understand that salaries are the main cost; that's exactly the thing that makes moving to a better langage attractive.)