You both could've done better in constructing your responses. He explained why yours was lacking, you explained why his was lacking. You both made valid points.

You both could've done better in constructing your responses. He explained why yours was lacking, you explained why his was lacking. You both made valid points. As for actually answering your question, probably only Walt's author could answer that. Unfortunately, due to your condescending choice of phrasing, he may choose to not engage in discussion with you, thinking that you're not sincerely interested in his answer. I hope he looks past that and does answer you, as I'm sure others are wondering similarly.