2 ms·

Thanks for the link! That is definitely a great news. I also found: http://blog.jimmy.schementi.com/2010/10/leadership-of-ironruby-and-ironpython.html http://bl

Thanks for the link! That is definitely a great news. I also found: http://blog.jimmy.schementi.com/2010/10/leadership-of-ironruby-and-ironpython.html http://blog.jimmy.schementi.com/2010/10/leadership-of-ironru... On the DLR: what makes you say the DLR will not receive contributions from the community (real question, as always) ?

equark 16y ago
See this post, there are two parts to DLR. http://lists.ironpython.com/pipermail/users-ironpython.com/2010-October/013879.html http://lists.ironpython.com/pipermail/users-ironpython.com/2... I believe Mono guys should be blogging about this tomorrow, so more on future will be known then. I think there's a lot of positives actually. It's unrealistic to think Microsoft was going to put big money into languages they have little control over, like python and ruby. They got dynamic into c# and f#. There is no reason to support python over clojure or any other new dlr language. I just hope the community is strong enough to make the DLR an even more compelling platform.