4 ms·
Even without guns, it's much easier to break a robot than it is to operate one. I think the economics of the physical economy favor the physical masses over the
by pjmorris 8y ago
Even without guns, it's much easier to break a robot than it is to operate one. I think the economics of the physical economy favor the physical masses over the paper wealthy.
- jedharris 8y agoIs it easier to break a tank than operate one? Then why a robot?
- pjmorris 8y agoI think I misplaced my post, the intent was to respond to someone arguing that automation would help the wealthy quell the poor. Any comments I make about robots apply to machinery in general. To your question, it is easier to break a tank than to operate one. Anti-tank weapons are cheaper than tanks, and range down to well-timed Molotov cocktails [0]. [0] https://www.quora.com/How-can-a-Molotov-cocktail-destroy-a-tank https://www.quora.com/How-can-a-Molotov-cocktail-destroy-a-t...