5 ms·
And those countries would not engage in surveillance if the US did not? You create a 2 country elementary payoff matrix for that game and tell everyone what the
by throwaway5752 8y ago
And those countries would not engage in surveillance if the US did not? You create a 2 country elementary payoff matrix for that game and tell everyone what the Nash equilibrium is.
- xvector 8y agoWhat does your comment say when translated to the language of mere mortals? Asking for a friend
- mrgalaxy 8y ago> And those countries would not engage in surveillance if the US did not? A rhetorical question about whether other countries would spy on citizens if the US were to stop. (Hint, the answer is that they absolutely would continue). > You create a 2 country elementary payoff matrix for that game and tell everyone what the Nash equilibrium is. I think this is saying that there is nothing for other countries to gain by stopping surveillance programs, even if the US were to. This is the Nash equilibrium[1]. [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nash_equilibrium https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nash_equilibrium
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- onetimemanytime 8y agoNever said or meant to say that. Nations have spied and will spy on each other. Just suggested that Juniper had been pwned, it seems unlikely for 30 or so vulnerabilities to be disclosed at the same time otherwise.