3 ms·
That is nonsense. 1) Those were armed terrorists intent on killing people. Not a mentally disturbed person (like the article we are discussing). 2) The areas
by jimnotgym 8y ago
That is nonsense.
1) Those were armed terrorists intent on killing people. Not a mentally disturbed person (like the article we are discussing).
2) The areas you are talking about are some of the most heavily policed areas in the UK. The police around Westminster are armed with MP5 sub-machine guns and assault rifles and are highly visible. Yet it is a public area, so yes you could walk up to one of them and start stabbing before one of his colleagues machine gunned you to pieces.
So what is your point? You can arm the police to the teeth, and a determined attacker could still kill one?
- paulddraper 8y ago> Those were armed terrorists intent on killing people. Not a mentally disturbed person (like the article we are discussing). And the police deal with both, including trying to distinguish one from the other. > The police around Westminster are armed with MP5 sub-machine guns and assault rifles and are highly visible. The dead cop did not have firearm. > So what is your point? The opposite of yours. Police need to be armed.
- jimnotgym 8y ago> The dead cop did not have firearm But was completely surrounded by those that were armed to military levels in large numbers.