Are we really discussing science from the WSJ? Any science reporting in the WSJ is meant for the sole purpose of bolstering the non-political credentials of wha

Are we really discussing science from the WSJ? Any science reporting in the WSJ is meant for the sole purpose of bolstering the non-political credentials of what is becoming an ever more right-leaning publication, thereby allowing its readers to participate in their own radicalization by pointing to articles like this as evidence that their source is "fair and balanced". Politics or pure Wall Street grist from WSJ, sure. Science?! We have plenty of better resources for it.