That's a great observation and reminder, thank you. I agree Ballmer's strategic actions were problematic for the larger technological ecosystem and only benefi

That's a great observation and reminder, thank you. I agree Ballmer's strategic actions were problematic for the larger technological ecosystem and only benefited Microsoft in shortsighted ways though they did establish Microsoft as the most important technology company in the world for nearly 10 years (1995 - 2005). It's been 4 years since Ballmer left Microsoft and it's taken some time for new management to effect change. Microsoft is a much more interesting, cooperative, and innovative company as a result. EDIT: Change "Ballmer" to "Ballmer's" and number agreement.