3 ms·
I think we can at least reduce that number down to 2 out of 5 without much cost or intervention.
by ada1981 8y ago
I think we can at least reduce that number down to 2 out of 5 without much cost or intervention.
- tshannon 8y agoI disagree. Without diligence, that number could skyrocket as high as 8 out of 20. Where would we be then?
- ada1981 8y agoI hadn’t considered this as deeply as I should have. I actually recall something out of the Regan Administration where a similar scenario actually ended up with numbers of 20 out of 50 - however that was largely speculative and not officially confirmed.