The "reasonable person" is a well-established principle in law, used to test whether someone's subjective claims of harm should be considered valid from an obje

The "reasonable person" is a well-established principle in law, used to test whether someone's subjective claims of harm should be considered valid from an objective viewpoint. Few would question that a "reasonable person" whose child was killed in a mass murder would be harmed by harassment, abuse, and claims the event didn't happen. I'm not normally any kind of bleeding heart, but stuff like this isn't difficult.