3 ms·
This is just re reporting Pat Gray's podcast. https://risky.biz/RB517_feature/ https://risky.biz/RB517_feature/ Also worth mentioning here is the background o
by mmaunder 8y ago
This is just re reporting Pat Gray's podcast.
https://risky.biz/RB517_feature/ https://risky.biz/RB517_feature/
Also worth mentioning here is the background on the credibility of these journo's that Robert Lee provides:
https://twitter.com/RobertMLee/status/1049617855396933632?s=19 https://twitter.com/RobertMLee/status/1049617855396933632?s=...
The most interesting tweet in that thread:
"They claimed anonymous US intelligence community sources as well. Except I led the ICS threat discovery mission at the time at the NSA. And I had never heard of this attack being a cyber attack. The NSA doesn’t see everything but if the US IC is your source we would have."
He is referring to the BTC pipeline piece that these guys wrote. It claims the pipeline explosion was a cyber attack, which has never been substantiated.
- monocasa 8y agoWhy would the the NSA ICS threat discovery lead at the time be able to confirm one way or another? It seems like either way would be a "no comment" sort of situation.
- mmaunder 8y agoHe is a SANS instructor, CEO of Dragos Inc and very well respected in the infosec community. Helpful input like this, and being an educator, is why he has that reputation.
- monocasa 8y agoBut like, "let me confirm off hand on twitter what classified things we did or didn't do at the NSA", is exactly what you can't say. Why is he being allowed to confirm/deny specific actions of the NSA?