If the claims are to be believed, the story was 1 year in the making and used 100 separate interviews and it was worked on by a team of journalists. I can easi

If the claims are to be believed, the story was 1 year in the making and used 100 separate interviews and it was worked on by a team of journalists. I can easily imagine ONE journalist getting key facts wrong in a typical story which had to be pumped out before a deadline. I've seen it myself. BUT this is a very major story by elite journalists with a lot to lose if they screw up. They're not "dumb" but they might have been deceived deliberately. Whatever the case, I expect a very ugly truth will shake out eventually.