> Any thoughts? Would this burden parsing or serialization? It's solving a problem we don't have. > Of course, it's simple to add a "name" or "type" field. H

> Any thoughts? Would this burden parsing or serialization? It's solving a problem we don't have. > Of course, it's simple to add a "name" or "type" field. However, the name of the object ought to be denoted differently than its contents, IMHO. Why?