3 ms·
1. because it is technically possible? 2. we should not 'believe'. but we should demand an investigation, and if it is true, then we may want to consider inve
by java-man 8y ago
1. because it is technically possible?
2. we should not 'believe'. but we should demand an investigation, and if it is true, then we may want to consider investing a bit into securing our infrastructure. maybe. maybe the agencies that are tasked with actually protecting our infrastructure actually do their job? instead of, you know, intercepting our communications.
and if it is not true, then we know who published the news, and who should publish a retraction and maybe pay a fine.