3 ms·

Isn't that the question, though. I don't think anyone is accusing them of publishing information that they know to be false. It seems more likely that their sou

Isn't that the question, though. I don't think anyone is accusing them of publishing information that they know to be false. It seems more likely that their sources are just not as good as believed and possibly have reinforced the details and information through an echo chamber. If these sources are within the same subsection of the industry and regularly exchange information, it may just be that they've been regurgitating information between themselves that somehow coalesced into a "real" story.

pishpash 8y ago
Not to be tin-foily, but it is also possible that Bloomberg has been deliberately fed or seeded with "bad" information -- it doesn't have to be an organic echo chamber. But no, I don't think Bloomberg itself set out to deliberately make a false story.
- dkonofalski 8y ago
  Of course it's possible. Foreign states have fed much less believable information to work against US interests and a good chunk of the population believes it wholesale.