Let's say Bloomberg did its due-diligence is telling the truth. That doesn't mean Apple here can't also be telling the truth as they see it. Bloomberg could h

Let's say Bloomberg did its due-diligence is telling the truth. That doesn't mean Apple here can't also be telling the truth as they see it. Bloomberg could have spoken to a few select individuals who shared things only they knew. I don't see any reason they couldn't have kept this hidden from others, allowing the upper management plausible deniability. These people lower on the totem pole could report to the government, and upper management could deny all day long. Couple this with my own personal experience with Apple sharing personal data it had no right to share, and the fact that only a single person signed this letter, and Bloomberg still not backing down, Apple has a way to go. They could start by having every person would would remotely be involved with something like this (from top to bottom) signing a legally binding letter attesting that Bloomberg's story is not true. Until you have this, it only takes one individual who hid something from Seniors to make this true.